Assessing the Value of a Technical Written Assignment After an Oral Interview

When a company follows up an oral interview with a technical written assignment to take home for a few days, the decision to proceed can vary depending on the specific circumstances and the candidate's perspective. In general, receiving such an assignment can be seen as a positive sign, indicating that the company is interested in your technical abilities and is looking for a deeper understanding of your skills. However, it is essential to approach this task with caution, especially if it appears to be an extended period of unpaid work or seems to involve a large number of people.

Positive Implications of a Technical Written Assignment

Confirmation of Interest: If the company provides a technical written assignment after an oral interview, it often indicates that they have a genuine interest in your candidacy. This step suggests that you have met the initial criteria and that the company wishes to assess your skills in more detail. The assignment serves as a practical evaluation of your expertise, offering a deeper understanding of your ability to solve complex problems or implement specific skills.

Selection Process: A written assignment can also be part of a structured selection process. It is a way for the company to evaluate your problem-solving skills, attention to detail, and ability to work independently. This format allows for a fair and unbiased assessment of your capabilities, which can be valuable compared to a one-time oral interview where initial impressions may play a significant role.

Concerns and Red Flags

Potential for Scams: It is important to be cautious if the assignment seems extensive and unsupervised. Some companies may use such assignments as a way to exploit potential employees by giving them an unrealistic workload without compensation. If you receive a written assignment that involves several days of work or a large number of tasks, it is crucial to assess the fairness and professionalism of the company. Legitimate companies typically recognize the value of their time and would not expect candidates to work for free for an extended period.

Work Verification: Sometimes, companies may use assignments to verify the authenticity of your skills. If you have a track record of unusual technical prowess, or if the role requires complex technical knowledge, the company may want to ensure that you have the necessary background. However, if the task appears to be overly burdensome or seems designed as a free labor experiment, it is advisable to seek clarification or avoid the assignment.

Best Practices for Handling the Assignment

Communication: Engage with the company to understand the expectations and the nature of the assignment. Clearly communicate any concerns or questions you may have about the workload or deadlines. This can help prevent misunderstandings and ensure that both parties have a clear understanding of the situation.

Maintain Professionalism: Even if the task seems dubious, it is important to maintain a professional attitude. Submitting the assignment in a timely and high-quality manner can still be beneficial, as it may positively influence your standing with the company. Additionally, if the company is legitimate, your efforts may lead to further opportunities.

Set Boundaries: If the assignment seems to be a scam or a form of exploitation, consider setting clear boundaries. Politely but firmly request clarification or refuse the assignment if it appears inappropriate. Your well-being and fairness should always be a priority.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a technical written assignment following an oral interview can be a positive indication of the company's commitment to understanding your skills and capabilities. However, it is crucial to be vigilant and cautious to avoid falling into scams or unfair practices. By communicating openly, maintaining professionalism, and setting appropriate boundaries, you can navigate this process in a way that benefits both your career and your well-being.