Choosing the Right Second Supervisor for Your PhD

Embarking on a PhD journey is both exciting and daunting. One significant decision you might face is whether and how to choose a second advisor or co-supervisor. This decision involves careful consideration of your reasons, potential benefits, and the dynamics of your relationships with advisors.

Reasons for Considering a Second Advisor

The first question you should ask yourself is: “Why am I contemplating adding a second advisor?” There must be a solid, genuine reason, not just a desire to enhance your committee's profile. For instance:

Methodology Expertise: Your primary advisor may lack expertise in a critical methodological area you need to address. Cross-Disciplinary Work: You want to explore a topic that spans multiple disciplines, and your first advisor is proficient in only one area. Emotional and Professional Support: You might need additional support or guidance that your primary advisor cannot provide. Specific Research Foci: Your research has multiple facets, and other advisors' expertise can complement your primary advisor's contributions.

It's crucial to evaluate whether adding a second supervisor would genuinely enhance your research and help in completing your dissertation.

Rules for Selecting a Second Advisor

Once you've determined a valid reason, here are some key rules to follow:

Rule 1: Obtain Immediate Approval from Your Principal Advisor

Clearly communicate your rationale to your primary advisor and obtain their agreement. It's critical to get their permission before approaching any other academic for supervision. Approaching the second advisor behind the back of your primary advisor can be disastrous:

You could be perceived as questioning your advisor's competence, damaging your professional relationship. This could lead to tension within your committee, hindering your progress and overall dissertation experience. It's crucial to respect and maintain open communication with your primary advisor.

Always ensure that your primary advisor is aware and agrees to the addition of a second advisor before moving forward.

Rule 2: Ensure Compatibility Between Advisors

The second rule is to ensure that your new advisor is not only competent but also compatible with your primary advisor and with you, personally. A harmonious working relationship is crucial:

Aim for a person who can work well with your primary advisor. Approach the topic of potential co-supervision delicately, asking your advisor if they could work with the second person. Pull in informal feedback from the department: “Can Donna work with George really?”

If there's any indication of disharmony, it's best to avoid proceeding. Even if the person says “Sure,” trust your instincts and seek further confirmation. Maintaining a positive relationship with all members of your committee is essential for a successful dissertation experience.

Conclusion

Selecting the right second supervisor or co-supervisor for your PhD is a decision that requires careful thought, clear communication, and a recognition of the importance of relationships within your academic community. By following the rules outlined above, you can ensure that your PhD journey is a collaborative and enriching experience.

Keywords: PhD advisor, Second supervisor, Co-supervisor