Debating Corporate DEI Priorities: Is Criticism Warranted?

Is it fair to criticize companies that prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)? In a world where we can scrutinize politicians, celebrities, athletes, and public figures, should we hold corporations to a different standard? Does being “diverse and inclusive” make a company inherently better?

The Necessity of Criticism

Some argue that governments and public figures have more influence and power, so they deserve more scrutiny. However, corporations play a significant role in our society. They shape our consumer culture, influence employment opportunities, and often have extensive reach into our daily lives. It is not a matter of which entity is more important, but rather that every player in society should be held accountable for their actions.

Are Corporations Better than Us?

The idea that corporations are some elite group above regular individuals is a myth. Any organization, whether a company, a government, or a personal relationship, is made up of individuals. Corporations are not exempt from the principles of humanity and justice. We are all capable of making mistakes and bettering ourselves.

However, it is crucial to recognize the unique responsibility that corporations bear. They are powerful entities that can significantly impact the lives of millions of people. Because of this, they must be held accountable for their actions, just like any other organization.

The Importance of Common Sense

In my opinion, the root of the issue is whether DEI should be considered solely in terms of characteristics like race, gender, or ethnicity. It is important to distinguish between DEI as a practice and DEI as a mere box to check. Diversity should not be prioritized simply for the sake of being diverse.

Some critics argue that a company should focus on qualities such as education, experience, and potential in their hiring and promotion processes. If these factors are equal among candidates, then DEI should not be the sole criterion for selection. Rather, DEI initiatives should aim to ensure that all candidates have equal opportunities, regardless of their background or personal characteristics.

The Story of Roosevelt Franklin

To better understand the nuances of this debate, let's revisit a memorable lesson from my childhood. I once listened to a Muppet called Roosevelt Franklin, who taught me an invaluable lesson. His name may not be a household name, but his message is timeless. Roosevelt Franklin stated, "Just Because" – a phrase that challenges us to question our assumptions and biases.

My Chaplain once told me to be polite and smile when dealing with difficult situations. This advice teaches us the importance of kindness and respect, even in the face of criticism or disagreement. It is a reminder that we should approach others with an open heart and a willingness to understand, rather than with anger or hostility.

Conclusion

Ultimately, criticism is not about discrediting the efforts of companies to promote DEI. It is about ensuring that these initiatives are genuine and focused on creating a fair and just environment for everyone. Corporate DEI efforts should be based on common sense and an understanding that every individual deserves equal opportunity, regardless of their background.

Let's continue to support and advocate for DEI initiatives that genuinely improve opportunities for all. At the end of the day, every individual has the potential to make a positive impact, and we must strive to recognize and support that potential in all its diversity.