Introduction to Equality and Freedom

Equality and freedom are often seen as fundamental human rights, yet proponents of these ideals sometimes struggle to reconcile them. This article aims to explore the compatibility of human equality with freedom, examining the distinctions between equality and equity and the role of government in shaping these concepts.

Equality: An Illusion of Existence

Equality, as a concept, does not truly exist in the realm of practical application. It is akin to certain elements on the periodic table — beautiful in theory, but lacking in practical reality. Equality often calls for uniform outcomes, an impossible feat in a diverse and inherently unequal world. Such an approach would require the government to force equal outcomes, an imposition that could only lead to bleak and oppressive societal conditions.

The Role of Government in Equity

Equity, on the other hand, operates as a fair and impartial system that ensures everyone is treated justly. While this may seem like a potential replacement for equality, it is crucial to recognize that equity is managed by the government. However, the government inherently infringes upon freedom by its very nature—its purpose is to regulate and control, not to protect freedom.

Freedom and Regulation: A Symbiotic Relationship

The assertion that leaving individuals to their own devices would lead to a better society is an appealing one. However, it is a concept fraught with contradictions. If regulation and policies are necessary to address societal issues, such as poverty and inequality, they also infringe upon freedom. For this reason, equity is often imperiled by the very government that seeks to maintain it.

The Natural Circumstances of Inequality

One of the most contentious points in this debate is the inherent inequality among individuals. People are not equal, and this inequality is why we have governments in the first place. Governments are established to address the harm some individuals cause to others, a process that ultimately sacrifices equity in pursuit of justice.

Equity Without Government: The Anarchic Implication

In an ideal anarchist society, where the government is abolished, individuals would be left to their own devices. This concept suggests that in the absence of external constraints, people would naturally achieve a state of equity by facing the consequences of their actions impartially. However, this notion ignores the stark reality that humans cannot coexist peacefully without some form of governmental structure to mitigate the inherent inequalities and harmful acts.

The Cost of Equity: Balancing Strength and Weakness

Efforts to create a more equitable society, such as ensuring equal educational opportunities, often involve transferring the strengths of some to those without them. Although this might seem like a fair solution, it is actually unfair to those with inherent strengths. Balancing the advantages and disadvantages of individuals in an equitable societal framework is inherently challenging and often requires some level of government intervention.

Conclusion: Finding a Balance Between Equality and Freedom

The pursuit of equity and the protection of freedom are not mutually exclusive. While the government must sometimes intervene to manage harmful behavior and ensure societal well-being, such intervention often sacrifices equity. The goal should be to find a balance that respects individual freedom while addressing societal inequalities without imposing an unrealistic concept of equality. This balance requires nuanced understanding and careful regulation, ensuring that the means of achieving equity do not inadvertently infringe upon the essential freedom of individuals.