Government Integrity in Business Transactions: An Insider's Perspective

During my career, I have interacted with various layers of government, including federal, provincial, and municipal levels, in both the United States and several foreign countries. One of the recurring topics is the issue of corruption in government actions, particularly when it comes to conducting business with different governmental bodies.

My experiences are, of course, anecdotal and based on personal observations. However, they provide a glimpse into how corruption manifests differently at various levels of government. The term 'corrupt' might be a strong one, but my interactions with municipal governments have consistently shown a higher incidence of less transparent practices. It's not surprising, as these officials often seek personal and short-term benefits rather than adhering to a system-driven process.

From Federal to Municipal: The Spectrum of Corruption

At the highest levels of government, such as the federal and provincial tiers, the process is typically system-driven. Decisions are made through structured frameworks, oversight, and accountability mechanisms, making it less susceptible to corruption. In contrast, grassroots-level municipal governments can be breeding grounds for such behaviors due to the personal influence and bias of individual officials.

During my time in Canada, I encountered a particularly notable instance of a 'request' originating from a provincial government level. This was surprising to me given the typically reverent nature of Canadian nationals towards their government. The provincial officials displayed a level of taint that extended beyond mere reverence towards a system of governance that holds the purse strings. Such corruption was driven by personal interests rather than a commitment to public service.

Another instance of corruption came from a purchasing agent at a well-regarded Catholic institution in the US. Even though this person was not in a leadership position, their actions demonstrated a disturbing lack of integrity. Similar experiences had occurred in another Catholic institution, leading me to write off the behavior as a product of youthful inexperience. However, the recurring nature of such incidents highlights the need for systemic changes to address corruption at the local level.

Factions and Ideologies: The Imaginary Side of Corruption

While my experiences are grounded in reality, contrasting these with the imagined world of indoctrination and propaganda provides a stark contrast. In the realm of indoctrination, dreams fueled by drugs and theoretical precepts often foster an illusion of a corruption-free world. These indoctrinated individuals, often labeled as sociopaths, psychos, or malignant narcissists, carry out their actions with the intent to bring about the downfall of those perceived as corrupt.

The individuals referred to as 'Tiny Tony Fauci Gyorgy the SchWANTZ' and 'Lyin' Hidin' dividin' Biden' are portrayed as representatives of a corrupt elite who have amassed resources and influenced global events through complex financial maneuvers. This narrative paints a picture of a centralized, multinational, and corporatocratic elite that manipulates global events for their benefit.

Hope and the Future

Contrary to the bleak narrative presented, the hope for a better future lies in education, transparency, and public awareness. Addressing corruption requires a multifaceted approach, starting from grassroots efforts to improve governance at local levels. While systemic changes are necessary, individual actions can also contribute to a more ethical business environment with governments.

It is crucial to recognize and report instances of corruption to combat it effectively. By doing so, we can foster a more transparent and accountable governance framework, which is essential for the well-being and development of societies. The focus should be on building a system that values integrity and public service over personal interests.

In conclusion, while corruption can be prevalent at various levels of government, particularly at the municipal and academic/administrative levels, there is always room for improvement. By promoting transparency, fostering a culture of integrity, and holding officials accountable, we can work towards a more just and equitable society.