India's Position on Bilateral Initiives with Pakistan: Echoes of the Kartarpur Corridor Saga

The Kartarpur Corridor, a landmark initiative by Pakistan to simplify visa processes for pilgrims visiting Gurdwara Panja Sahib, has highlighted the complex dynamics in India-Pakistan relations. As discussions continue, many in India are questioning whether further goodwill gestures towards Pakistan would merely compound past grievances.

India's Current Stance

India has consistently maintained that it will not take any initiatives to normalize its relationship with Pakistan unless Pakistan reciprocates with concrete steps towards peace and harmony. The ruling party's perspective is that such initiatives could be perceived as a tool for political posturing.

Historical Context and Criticism

India has faced criticism over its previous goodwill gestures. Some argue that these initiatives have been self-serving and have not been reciprocated with tangible peace. Criticisms also range from 1990s Mumbai serial bomb blasts and train bombings to the more recent 2008 Mumbai attacks and the Pathankot terrorist attacks of 2016. Many lament the loss of life and the radicalization of state youths as a result of these actions.

The Kartarpur Corridor Controversy

The Kartarpur Corridor has sparked heated debates. Critics argue that Pakistan's initiative is a guise to garner sympathy from Sikhs worldwide and to radicalize them. India's concern over the corridor stems from its proximity to the Indian side, suggesting that Pakistan is benefiting from India's goodwill.

A notable perspective is that the current policy of allowing pilgrims to visit Kartarpur is rooted in historical oversights. If India's leaders had taken actions earlier, they would have easily regained control over the area, thereby allowing pilgrims easier access without involving Pakistan.

Future Approach

India's future approach is rooted in a pragmatic stance. It has proposed that Pakistan must show 50 years of goodwill gestures before India reciprocates. This condition ensures that Pakistan genuinely wishes for a better relationship. The emphasis is on concrete actions and not political rhetoric.

The argument for this stance is underscored by the survival of the fittest principle. Any goodwill gestures must be followed by results, and unless Pakistan demonstrates genuine interest and commitment, India will remain wary.

Cultural and Mindset Considerations

It is important to acknowledge that India's approach is not devoid of compassion. However, historical and cultural perceptions of enemy and friend differ. In India, it is believed that even enemies deserve some respect and compassion, which is rooted in the concept of Sanatan Sanskriti. Nevertheless, in a world driven by realpolitik, actions and results are paramount.

Conclusion

The debate around India's position on bilateral initiatives with Pakistan is ongoing. Whether through the Kartarpur Corridor or other such measures, there is a call for Pakistan to demonstrate true intent and commitment. For India, it is about protecting its interests and ensuring a peaceful future, one good gesture at a time.