Individualism and Collectivism: Comparing American and European Societies
Introduction
The terms 'individualism' and 'collectivism' often get used in a performative manner, where they effectively translate to 'things I support' and 'things I oppose'. This article delves into the complexities of these terms by comparing American and European societies, offering insights into which is more individualistic and which is more collectivist.
The Nature of Individualism and Collectivism
The words 'individualist' and 'collectivist' have been stretched to the point where they lose their original meanings. They are often used to label any behavior or policy that aligns with the speaker's beliefs. For instance, a person could vehemently oppose collectivism and still advocate for significant government action to foster patriotism, without feeling internally conflicted.
European Societies vs. American Society
When discussing the differences between American and European societies, it's important to consider the underlying social structures and cultural norms. Europeans are often seen as 'subjects' while Americans are 'citizens', which reflects the differing hierarchies within their societies. In Europe, the emphasis often lies on community and collective responsibility, whereas in America, the focus is more on personal freedom and self-reliance.
The Elite in the USA
It is a common misconception that the elite in the USA are completely individualistic. In reality, the upper echelons of American society are quite cooperative and gentle in demeanor. However, this cooperative spirit is often not extended to the working class, particularly in the Southern regions of the United States. The idea that there's a strong sense of community in Southern USA is a myth. The society is highly individualistic, and many migrant communities have thrived while the local working class has struggled to fend for themselves.
The Southern USA: A Hard-Working Individualist Culture
The Southern USA lacks a strong sense of community, especially in cities like Myrtle Beach, Charleston, Savannah, Austin, and Atlanta. The society is characterized by individualism, where people do not help one another and focus solely on work, money, and cheap labor. The local Southern people feel no sense of responsibility toward one another, which often leads to them working long hours to ensure financial security. This sense of individualism has also led to poor treatment of fellow Southerners, who are often given limited hours, low wages, and little to no benefits. The southern culture seems to promote the idea that helping others is undesirable, especially during difficult times.
Migrant Communities in the South
Contrastingly, migrant communities from the Middle East, South America, and Eastern Europe have a strong sense of unity and mutual support. These communities often enrich each other with job opportunities, high salaries, and business advice. In many ways, the migrant communities have thrived in the Southern economy, while the local Southern-born workers have struggled to do so. This highlights the stark difference in approaches to collectivism and individualism between the different groups.
Conclusion
The differences between individualism and collectivism in American and European societies are complex and multifaceted. While there are cultural and structural differences that contribute to these differing approaches, it is important to understand that both systems can coexist and coevolve. The debate between individualism and collectivism is not just about personal freedom vs. community responsibility; it is also about the role of the state in fostering both individual well-being and collective unity.