Legality and Historical Precursors of Double Burial: The Case of David Livingstone and Christopher Columbus

The practice of burying individuals in multiple cemeteries is not a recent phenomenon. From historical figures like David Livingstone to revered explorers such as Christopher Columbus, it has become a significant status symbol imbued with cultural and historical significance.

David Livingstone: A Tale of Loyalty and Geographical Divide

Well, Dr. David Livingstone is a case in point. His remains were divided between two continentsa touching tribute to both his life and legacy. In Africa, his heart was buried as a token of the love and respect of his loyal servants. His body, however, was returned to England and interred in Westminster Abbey, a revered burial ground for distinguished figures in British history.

Historical Precedents of Simultaneous and Chronological Burials

The historical record shows that such actions have occurred both simultaneously and chronologically. Take, for example, the case of Christopher Columbus, an individual whose remains have been commemorated in two distinct cemeteries in different parts of the world.

Christopher Columbus: A Traveler in Death

Christopher Columbus's final journey was a whirlwind of movements and transfers. After his disastrous fourth voyage to the New World, Columbus grew old and infirm before returning to Spain in 1504. He died in Valladolid in May of 1506, and he was initially buried there. However, his remains stirred much debate and movement due to his considerable stature.

Drawn by his wish to be laid to rest in the New World, his remains were eventually moved to the convent at La Cartuja, an island near Seville, Spain. But the quest for a more permanent resting place extended further. In 1537, Columbus's bones, along with those of his son Diego, were transported to Santo Domingo, the famed city in the Dominican Republic, to rest in the local cathedral.

Consequently, Columbus traveled extensively posthumously, embarking on five round-trip journeys to the New World. His remains were moved numerous times due to geopolitical upheavals and battles. For instance, in 1795, Spain transferred Hispaniola, including Santo Domingo, to France as part of a peace treaty. To prevent his remains from falling into enemy hands, they were relocated to Havana, the then capital of Cuba.

When Spain declared war on the United States in 1898, the remains were brought back to Spain, completing another round-trip journey. This complex history of his remains highlights how even in death, history and culture intertwined for Columbus.

Legal and Cultural Considerations

While these instances demonstrate the historical prevalence of double burials, they also raise questions about their legality and cultural significance. Different countries and religions may have distinct regulations regarding secondary burials or transfers of remains. The legal aspects often involve disputes over ownership, historical acknowledgment, and respect for cultural traditions.

The legal status of a person's remains following their death is a contentious issue. In many instances, there are no clear guidelines. Families, historians, and governments might have conflicting claims over the right to preserve and relocate a person's remains. This highlights the need for clear and standardized legal frameworks to handle such matters.

Conclusion

The practice of double burials is a testament to the enduring legacies of historical figures. From David Livingstone to Christopher Columbus, these practices offer intriguing insights into the intersection of culture, history, and law. As we continue to commemorate those who have shaped our past, the complexities of burial practices and their legal and cultural implications remain a significant area of study.

References

History of Columbus Remains in the Dominican Republic Biography of Christopher Columbus National Geographic: Columbus Remains