Potential Consequences for Prince Harry if His Visa Application Lies are Uncovered

The allegations surrounding Prince Harry's visa application have brought to light serious concerns about his intentions and activities. If it is discovered that he knowingly lied on his application, the ramifications could be severe.

Who You Know in US Immigration Law

Historically, US immigration laws have not been upheld without significant influence, often bending to the whims of powerful connections. It is not uncommon for high-profile individuals to be granted exceptions, even when breaking the law. This reality underscores the importance of following the established legal framework.

Prince Harry's case highlights the inherent flaws in a system that prioritizes politically expedient outcomes over adherence to the law. The current system, where personal connections sometimes outweigh the rule of law, is deeply troubling. It perpetuates an environment where those in power can circumvent the system, setting a dangerous precedent.

Deserving Deportation, a Just Outcome?

If Prince Harry indeed lied on his visa application, his deportation would be a more fitting consequence than the leniency shown by the current system. His criminal history, drug use, and recent involvement in a trafficking scandal do not bode well for his case.

Prince Harry's actions and abuses claim that he brings nothing to the United States. He is known for his irresponsible behavior, both in his personal life and with his family. His memoir, 'Spare,' further reveals a lifestyle of substance abuse and poor judgment, and recent allegations of involvement in a trafficking scandal only add to these concerns.

The question remains: do we need another individual who not only abuses the system but also spreads negative rhetoric about the country on a global scale? Deportation is not just a legal measure; it is a call for justice and integrity in the immigration process.

HorizontalAlignment: Deportation or North Korea?

For some, the notion of sending Prince Harry to a country like North Korea may seem like a form of modern-day excommunication. However, for many critics, this suggestion is seen as a viable alternative to allowing such a person to continue to cause harm and disruption. The idea is not to punish him, but to ensure that he faces the consequences of his actions.

While not religious, some hope that the universal principle of justice would prevail. If the US authorities are lenient, they might be sending a message that privileged figures can abuse the system without repercussions. This, in turn, could embolden others to follow suit. It is crucial that the law is enforced fairly and without bias.

Considering the backlash against Prince Harry, the United Kingdom itself has little interest in retaining his presence. Therefore, it would be wise for the US to consider his fate seriously. North Korea, regardless of the harsh conditions, could perhaps offer a temporary solution until more appropriate measures are taken.