Questioning the Model Code of Conduct: Marred Credibility or Selective Enforcement?
Questioning the Model Code of Conduct: Marred Credible or Selective Enforcement?
Every election in India is punctuated by a set of rules designed to ensure a level playing field, fairness, and ethical campaigning. These guidelines are collectively known as the Model Code of Conduct (MCC).
The Model Code of Conduct is a manual issued by the Election Commission (EC) of India, which aims to regulate political behavior during the election period to maintain a fair electoral environment. However, recent controversies surrounding the development and release of certain content have cast a shadow of doubt over the EC's commitment to this code.
Has NaMo TV and the Movie Narendra Modi Violated the Model Code of Conduct?
Two recent developments have raised eyebrows: the launch of NaMo TV and the release of the movie titled PM Narendra Modi. Both these projects have been scrutinized under the Model Code of Conduct, but the response from the Election Commission (EC) has been largely non-committal, leading to questions about the effectiveness of the EC in upholding these guidelines.
NaMo TV, the official video channel of PM Narendra Modi, is often seen as a powerful platform for disseminating information and reaching out to voters. Similarly, the movie PM Narendra Modi presents the Prime Minister in a biographical and promotional manner, serving as a form of content that can significantly influence public opinion. Given the sensitive nature of these projects, their alignment with the Model Code of Conduct becomes a significant concern.
Election Commission's Silence: An Indication of Loss of Credibility?
The silence from the Election Commission regarding these developments is perplexing. While initial attempts to dismiss the concerns might be seen as a standard procedural response, the prolonged absence of clarification or action has raised doubts about the EC's ability and willingness to enforce the Model Code of Conduct.
The lack of a clear stance can be interpreted in two ways: either the EC has indeed lost its credibility, or there is a selective enforcement of these rules. The latter interpretation casts a disturbing light on the fairness of the electoral process, suggesting that certain factions might be given a pass while others are subject to scrutiny.
Time for a Transparent Police: The Case for T. N. Seshan
To restore faith in the electoral process, it may be imperative to bring in a trusted individual to oversee the enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct. One name frequently mentioned in this context is T. N. Seshan, a respected former Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) known for his integrity and robust enforcement of electoral laws. His return could potentially reignite the public's trust in the EC and ensure that the rules are applied uniformly.
Argument Against the Violation: A Closer Look at Previous Cases
Some might argue that the launch of TIRANGA TV and the release of the movie Udta Punjab did not constitute a breach of the Model Code of Conduct. These precedents have left many questioning the selective enforcement of these rules. Here are some points to consider:
TIRANGA TV: Originally Launched as HARVEST TV
TIRANGA TV, which was initially launched as HARVEST TV, did serve an agricultural purpose before taking on a more political hue. This evolution was viewed as a method to provide rural voters with relevant content, which, while controversial, did not necessarily breach the Model Code of Conduct.
Udta Punjab: Launched During Punjab Elections
The movie Udta Punjab was released during the Punjab Assembly elections. While it received significant backlash for glorifying drug abuse, its release was defended on the grounds that it belonged to a different time period when elections were ongoing.
NaMo TV and Movie Narendra Modi: Unique Contexts
However, NaMo TV and the movie PM Narendra Modi present a different scenario. While these projects also claim to serve a public interest, they are presented in a manner that could be construed as promotional and beneficial to the incumbent government. The question remains whether these projects are legitimate extensions of a private media entity or should be considered part of official government communication.
Conclusion
The ongoing debate around NaMo TV and the movie PM Narendra Modi is more than just a legal or technical issue. It involves the broader question of inclusive democracy and the role of the electoral commission in maintaining a level playing field. The public's faith in these institutions is crucial, and the silence from the EC only exacerbates the existing doubts.
As citizens, we must demand transparency and accountability. Bringing in a figure like T. N. Seshan could be a step in the right direction. His presence would not only strengthen the EC's credibility but also ensure that the rules of the game are applied uniformly to all participants in the electoral process.