How Will RSS Survive Without Modi and Shah?

The RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) is an organization that thrives beyond the influence of individual leaders. Unlike many political parties or organizations that are often controlled by a family or a single figure, the RSS stands as a beacon of a shared ideology and vision that transcends personal allegiance.

RSS as an Ideological Movement

Founded on 27 September 1925, the RSS has stood the test of time, surviving through various political climates. It has seen the British Raj, the Congress era, and Beyond. The organization was neither involved in the Gandhi murder allegations nor did it succumb to the ban that followed. Rather, it was invited to participate in the Republic Day parade. Thus, it symbolizes the evolution of nationalistic ideologies.

The RSS is more than a political party; it is an ideology and a way of thinking. It has a dedicated cadre base and its leaders come and go, but the institution endures. This is due to its commitment to meritocracy, not dynastic succession. This robust framework ensures that the RSS will continue to flourish even after leaders like Modi and Shah have stepped down.

Legacy of Meritocracy

One of the key strengths of the RSS is its merit-based leadership. New leaders like Tejashwi Pratap Singh and Jay Shankar have emerged from humble beginnings to lead new movements. These individuals are not part of the dynastic lineage and bring fresh perspectives to the party. This demonstrates the resilience and adaptability of the RSS to new leadership and changing times.

The RSS continues to focus on its karyakartas (volunteers) who dedicate their time and resources voluntarily. Without seeking compensation from the organization, these volunteers ensure the longevity and sustainability of the RSS. This selfless dedication has been a cornerstone of the RSS's success and provides a solid foundation for the future.

Future Leadership and the 100th Anniversary

As the RSS celebrates its 100th anniversary in four years, it will have seen periods when key leaders like Modi and Shah were not in the political limelight. The organization remains strong and adaptable, suggesting that it will continue to thrive irrespective of the political landscape. This robust structure ensures that the RSS will find new leaders to carry on its mission.

The survival of the RSS is not contingent on the presence of specific leaders but rather on its ideology and strong grassroots support. The organization’s focus on meritocracy and voluntary service ensures that it can withstand the test of time and continue to influence Indian society.

Conclusion

The future of the RSS is not predicated on the individual leadership of figures such as Modi and Shah. The organization's robust structure and commitment to meritocracy ensure its continued relevance and success. The RSS is an enduring force in Indian politics, built on a foundation of ideological commitment and selfless dedication.