Why Employers Insist on Keeping Workers on Their Feet: The Stand-or-Sit Debate

The longstanding debate in the workplace between standing and sitting has become especially prominent in certain industries. Employers often have varying reasons for requiring their employees to stand during tasks that do not necessarily require it, ranging from productivity concerns to traditional norms. One such industry is retail pharmacy, where the work-station model has long been the norm.

Productivity Concerns

Many employers believe that standing can boost energy levels and thus increase productivity. The rationale is that employees who stand are more alert and engaged, leading to more efficient and higher-quality work. This belief stems from the idea that being on one's feet promotes better circulation and alertness, which can translate into improved performance.

Health and Safety

In industries where standing is deemed safer, such as in construction or manufacturing, employers may argue that it reduces the risk of accidents or injuries. In these environments, the areas where employees sit might pose greater risks, and standing can be seen as a safer position. Additionally, some tasks that require constant movement and precision can benefit from the stability provided by standing.

Workplace Culture

Workplace culture can also play a significant role in whether employees are allowed to sit. Some environments emphasize activity and movement to maintain a dynamic and productive atmosphere. Employers may feel that a more casual or relaxed setting, where employees can sit, would harm their work ethos. This cultural aspect can sometimes override actual health and safety considerations.

Space Limitations

In settings with limited space, providing seating can create clutter and obstruct workflows, which can lower overall productivity. For example, in a small pharmacy or office, seating could interfere with the movement of supplies and people, leading to inefficiencies and potential safety hazards.

Supervision and Engagement

Employers might also believe that standing allows for better supervision and engagement with employees. This can foster a more dynamic work environment, making it easier for managers to observe and interact with team members, which can improve supervision and foster a sense of team cohesion.

Traditional Norms

In many industries, standing while working has become a traditional norm. Employers can be reluctant to change established practices, even if these practices are harming employee health. In retail pharmacies, the work-station model has been the norm for years, with many employees standing for extended periods. This can lead to various health issues, including varicose veins, lower back problems, and foot issues. For example, in retail pharmacies, the traditional “work-station” model often requires pharmacists and technicians to stand for long shifts with no breaks, which can strain their bodies and lead to chronic health problems.

The Impact on Retail Pharmacists

In the retail pharmacy industry, pharmacists often work long hours with no breaks or lunch. As a result, their physical health can suffer significantly. One pharmacy worker, who has worked in retail pharmacies for several years, describes the challenges of standing for up to 12 or 14 hours without a break. The workers in these settings are required to stand at receiving, data entry, and prescription filling stations, with no option to sit. This can lead to a range of health issues, including:

Varicose Veins: Prolonged standing can increase the risk of developing varicose veins, which can be painful and require medical treatment. Lower Back Problems: The constant pressure and strain on the back from standing for long periods can lead to chronic pain and other spinal issues. Hemorrhoids: These are another common issue that can develop from prolonged standing, often leading to discomfort and potential health risks. Foot Problems: The strain on the feet from standing all day can lead to issues such as plantar fasciitis, which can be debilitating.

Some employers may allow employees to sit at certain stations, like data entry or verification, but the enforcement is often inconsistent. For example, in retail pharmacies like CVS or Kroger, standing is often mandatory, with no facilities for employees to take a break and sit. Employers may believe that a chair or stool would promote laziness or reduce productivity, but this is often not the case. Many employees would be willing to take a break and sit down for a few hours during their 8-hour shift if given the chance.

Conclusion: The Need for Flexibility and Ergonomics

While standing can have some benefits, it is important for employers to balance productivity with employee comfort and well-being. Many organizations are recognizing the benefits of ergonomic practices and flexible work arrangements, including the option to sit when appropriate. Workplaces should consider the well-being of their employees, especially in industries where standing for long periods is the norm. Employers need to ensure that their policies do not contribute to the development of chronic health issues and that they are following best practices for occupational health and safety.