The Biden-Harris Administration and the Increase in Illegals: A Deliberate Strategy or Acceptance of Failures?

Under the administration of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, there has been a significant increase in the number of illegals entering the United States. This marked rise has sparked debates and scrutiny on whether the administration's decision was a deliberate strategy or a result of accepting past failures. Critics argue that the influx of illegal immigrants is primarily aimed at diluting the power of the Republican party and disenfranchising the voting public, while supporters defend the administration's actions as a necessary response to an ongoing issue.

Deliberate Strategy or Administrative Inertia?

One of the prevailing hypotheses is that the increase in the number of illegals is part of a strategic effort by the Biden-Harris Administration. Proponents of this view argue that the administration aims to undermine the voting power of independents and Republicans and create a more favorable electoral environment for the Democrats. This strategy involves importing large numbers of non-American citizens and providing them with amnesty, thereby creating a new voting bloc that aligns with the Democratic party's interests.

According to this perspective, the administration's decisions are not a result of a lack of effective border protections but are instead a calculated move to shift the political landscape in their favor. It is argued that the administration's policies are rooted in longer-term political goals rather than immediate security concerns or public safety.

Legality and Criticism

The notion that there are "illegals" entering the country hinges on the idea that there is a clear legal boundary between those who should be allowed to enter and those who should not. However, the concept of "illegality" is often controversial and subject to varying interpretations and enforcement.

Supporters of this view often cite former President Donald Trump's alleged successes in building a "wall" to protect the country from illegal immigrants. They argue that the current increase in illegals can be attributed to a relaxation of border controls and a shift in enforcement priorities. This argument raises questions about the effectiveness of previous administrations' efforts and the current administration's commitment to maintaining border security.

Political and Legislative Implications

The increase in illegals has significant political and legislative implications. One of the most contentious aspects is the representational dilation of the American public in Congress. States that benefit from the influx of illegal immigrants, such as California, New York, Illinois, and Texas, see an increase in congressional representation despite not reflecting the broader demographic changes in the country.

The argument is that these states gain an unfair advantage in terms of their representation in Congress, leading to an outsized influence on federal policies. Democrats in these states use this representation to their advantage, pushing for policies that benefit their constituents and maintain their political power.

Conclusion

The debate around the influx of illegals under the Biden-Harris Administration reflects a broader discussion about border security, legislative representation, and political strategy. While some view the increase as a deliberate strategy to shift the political landscape, others see it as a failure of past administrations to maintain effective border controls.

The issue remains complex and contentious, touching on broader themes of national security, political representation, and the future of democracy in the United States.