The Complex Lenses Through Which Kashmiri Muslims View Narendra Modi

ции can find a wide spectrum of views among Kashmiri Muslims regarding Narendra Modi. While opinions diverge on his policies and actions, they share a common sentiment of deep-seated dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs in Kashmir. This article explores the diverse perspectives and sentiments of Kashmiri Muslims towards the Indian Prime Minister, shedding light on the complex interplay of personal and political factors.

Admiration Amidst Dissatisfaction

One Kashmiri Muslim, while expressing dislike for Modi, also admires his stance for the country. The individual writes, 'We do not like him, but I admire this man for one thing that he stood for his country somehow.' This sentiment highlights a certain level of recognition for Modi's leadership during times of national crisis, even if it does not extend to personal approval.

Hope for Greater Freedom

The same Kashmiri Muslim expresses a desire for more freedom and equality within India. They express a deep sadness at the mistreatment of Kashmiris in different cities of the country: 'My heart goes down when we are beaten in different cities of India.' This reflects the yearning for justice and equality in the face of perceived discrimination.

The individual also shows a pragmatic outlook, stating, 'However, I am little liberal in thoughts and that's why I would like to see more development in our state, especially in my region of Baramullah.' This indicates a desire for progress and improvement, alongside a recognition of the region's unique needs and challenges.

Athwart the Tide of Acceptance and Rejection

When it comes to accepting Modi's leadership, the sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, with Kashmiri Muslims seeing him as a 'devil.' The phrase 'bun khyo gagdo' (eaten by rats) in Kashmir's protest songs paints a vivid picture of the extent of the animosity. For many Kashmiri Muslims, Modi's actions are seen as a continuation of India's oppressive policies in the region.

Theorical and Emotional Contexts

A commentator who is not a Kashmiri Muslim reflects on the broader context of Kashmir's struggle for freedom. They express deep empathy for the Kashmiri people, who have been fighting for their rights for over a century. The tone of the comment underscores the complexity of the issue, where personal sentiments and historical grievances intertwine:

''What can they possibly think of India and Narendra Modi? They have been fighting for their freedom for almost a hundred years. They have been met with brute military force since the time of Hari Singh and his Uncle. The flimsy thread that was linking them to India was Article 370, which was being diluted since day one. Their beloved leader Sheikh Abdullah was incarcerated for seventeen years by an Indian secular government to crush his soul to sign Kashmir accord in 1975. Since then, there were rigged elections, presidents' rule, and Military AFSPA for more than twenty-five years. Now, the last straw is that their popular leaders are under house arrest, Article 370 has been abrogated, and more forces are deployed in an already the heavily militarized zone in the world.''

This reflection not only highlights the historical context but also questions the very essence of India as a secular democracy. It poses a stark question to the broader Indian populace: how would they feel if their basic rights and freedoms were similarly compromised?

The Role of the UN and International Perspective

To provide an international perspective, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, David Kaye, describes the communication blackout in Kashmir as 'unprecedented' for a democratic society. This statement reflects the global concern over the situation in Kashmir and the impact on civil liberties.

Interestingly, Kashmiri people are silenced with a 'mighty force.' They are under a state of shock due to deceit, brutality, and broken promises. However, they cannot voice their opinions because their leaders are under house arrest, their phones and internet connections are down, and their cities are under curfew. The Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) has been in place for more than a quarter of a century, further complicating the situation.

The commentator concludes by asking, 'If my language, my special status, my right to vote, or my reservation in jobs is revoked in the same manner, what would our opinion on Kashmir say about our sense of honesty and our sense of decency?' This question invites introspection and accountability, urging the Indian populace to reflect on their own values and actions.

In summary, Kashmiri Muslims' views on Narendra Modi are deeply rooted in their historical struggle and current experiences. While some may admire certain aspects of his leadership, the predominant sentiment is one of dissatisfaction, reflecting a wider desire for freedom, justice, and equality in their homeland.