The Evolution of the Changing Complexity and Clarity Operator in TRIZ

The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) has undergone significant transformations since its inception, adapting to the evolving landscape of innovation and problem-solving methodologies. One of the critical changes relates to the operator known for changing Complexity and Clarity. This article explores the implications and evolution of this operator within ARIZ (Algorithm for Solving Inventive Problems), highlighting its impact on the overall TRIZ methodology.

Complexity and Clarity: The Original Context

Initially, the operator for changing Complexity and Clarity was included to add a layer of complexity to the problem-solving process by introducing variable parameters such as size, time, and cost. This was thought to enrich the problem space and stimulate more diverse and innovative solutions. However, the presence of this operator often made the ARIZ process cumbersome and less straightforward for practitioners to apply effectively.

Focusing on Contradictions

Later versions of ARIZ shifted the emphasis towards identifying and resolving contradictions rather than simply adjusting parameters like size, time, or cost. This aligns with a core principle of TRIZ, which is that innovative solutions often emerge from resolving technical contradictions. By focusing on contradictions, practitioners can target the root cause of the problem, leading to more efficient and effective solutions.

Broader Applicability

The removal of the changing Complexity and Clarity operator expanded the scope of TRIZ applications. This broader applicability is crucial for addressing a wider range of challenges, particularly those that are complex and nuanced in nature. Innovators can now apply TRIZ to problems that extend beyond simple parameter adjustments, making the framework more versatile in real-world scenarios.

Integration with Other Tools

The development of TRIZ has always involved integration with various tools and methods, each addressing the same problems from different angles. By removing the changing Complexity and Clarity operator, the framework could more effectively incorporate other innovative techniques that align better with the overall philosophy of TRIZ. This integration enriches the TRIZ toolkit and enhances its overall utility.

User Feedback and Community Involvement

The evolution of TRIZ is significantly influenced by its community of practitioners. Over time, user feedback played a crucial role in refining the methodology. Some early adopters found the changing Complexity and Clarity operator to be less useful than initially anticipated. By listening to this feedback and continuously improving based on practical experience, TRIZ has become more effective and user-friendly.

Current Status and Multiple Perspectives

The recent insertion of this operator at the step 8.3 of ARIZ-85V has sparked debate among practitioners. Some find ARIZ 85V very confusing, while others appreciate the underlying tools and find them rewarding to learn. The inclusion or exclusion of this operator reflects the diverse needs and perspectives within the TRIZ community. Each version of ARIZ resonates with different individuals and organizations, and the flexibility to include or exclude components like the changing Complexity and Clarity operator highlights the dynamic nature of TRIZ as a problem-solving framework.

Conclusion

The removal of the changing Complexity and Clarity operator in TRIZ reflects a strategic evolution aimed at enhancing the methodology's effectiveness and usability. By simplifying the problem-solving process and focusing on contradictions, TRIZ has become more accessible and applicable to a broader range of challenges. As TRIZ continues to evolve, it remains an essential tool for those seeking innovative solutions to complex problems.