The Impact of Political Correctness on Modern Society and Its Divisiveness

Whether you believe political correctness is an essential tool for promoting fairness and inclusion or a inane linguistic and social constraint, it's undeniable that it has had a profound influence on how we interact and how we perceive others. In this article, we explore the arguments for and against political correctness and its impact on social harmony and free speech.

Introduction to Political Correctness

Political correctness, often abbreviated as PC, refers to avoiding language or actions that could be considered offensive or exclusionary. It began in the 1990s as a way to promote social equality and inclusion. However, its application has expanded to encompass a wide range of social issues, often referred to as Wokeness.

Is Political Correctness Necessary?

Advocates of political correctness argue that it fosters a more inclusive and fair society. By using language that does not alienate or marginalize certain groups, it ensures that everyone feels respected and valued. For instance, the push for gender-neutral language and the use of specific pronouns aim to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes and giving voice to marginalized communities.

Critics, on the other hand, view it as an unnecessary and restrictive set of rules. They argue that the emphasis on etiquette and sensitivity stifles free speech and creativity, and often finds itself being abused by those with ulterior motives. For example, they point out the absurdity of banning literature like To Kill a Mockingbird and changing simple titles like "Ladies and Gentlemen" to cater to non-binary identities, which, they argue, serve no greater purpose beyond political correctness for the sake of it.

The Evolution of Political Correctness: From 1990s to Modern Times

The 1990s saw the rise of political correctness as a formal movement, driven by a desire to address systemic inequalities. At the time, it was an effort to promote greater inclusivity in the workplace and in societal norms. However, as the movement gained momentum, it began to go beyond mere sensitivity and into the realm of absolute correctness, often leading to absurd scenarios and over-sensitivity.

What started as a way to promote social equality has now become so rigid that it seems almost all cases of language or behavior are judged by a set of ironclad rules. This shift has led to a growing resistance against what many see as an overly restrictive and sometimes nonsensical social code.

The Verdict: Is It Sensible or Nonsensical?

The question of whether political correctness is sensible or nonsensical is a complex one. It depends largely on one's perspective. Those who support it argue that it helps to create a more inclusive and equitable society, while critics contend that it suppresses free speech and stifles creativity.

It is important to recognize that political correctness can be a double-edged sword. While it can promote positive change by addressing discrimination and marginalization, it can also lead to unnecessary offenses and a lack of genuine dialogue. What's more, such rules often fail to apply equally across different cultural and social contexts, further enhancing division and misunderstanding.

A Call for Sensible Political Correctness

To find a middle ground, it is essential to advocate for sensible political correctness. Sensible political correctness means using language and actions that promote inclusion and fairness but do not undermine free speech or creativity. It requires a balanced approach that recognizes the importance of context and the potential for humor and nuance in communication.

For instance, when it comes to literature, instead of banning books or changing titles to avoid potential offense, we could focus on educational discussions about the context and intent behind the language used. Similarly, when it comes to titles and announcements, a more flexible approach would ensure that the message is clear and respectful without causing unnecessary disruption or offense.

The Future of Political Correctness

The future of political correctness remains uncertain. While some argue that it will fade away as it did in the 2000s, others believe it is here to stay, albeit in a more moderated form. As society evolves, so too will our understanding of what constitutes sensible political correctness.

Given the current rapid changes in society and technology, it is likely that we will see a more nuanced approach to language and behavior that respects diverse perspectives while maintaining a balance between sensitivity and freedom of expression.

Conclusion

The debate over political correctness is far from over. While some may see it as a crucial tool for progress and inclusivity, others view it as an unnecessary and overly restrictive set of rules. What is clear is that the path forward lies in finding a sensible balance between the two.

Only by embracing a more thoughtful and inclusive approach can we truly create a society that values both fairness and free speech. As we move forward, let us strive towards a world where everyone feels respected and valued, without sacrificing the essence of open and honest dialogue.