Introduction to the 'Special Relationship'

The term 'special relationship' between the United States and the United Kingdom is often invoked by both governments. However, this label is more of a convenient myth than an accurate depiction of their ongoing relationship. This essay critically examines the historical and contemporary dimensions of this relationship, challenging the notion of its 'special' nature.

Historical Context and Churchill's Original Description

The concept of the 'special relationship' was first coined by Winston Churchill in 1946. He described it as a strong military alliance characterized by joint training, exercises, and interchangeable ammunition. This relationship was reinforced with the formation of NATO in 1949, which aimed to include a broader group of nations under a mutual defense pact. However, it's important to note that this original conception of the 'special relationship' has evolved significantly over the years.

The Nature of the 'Special Relationship'

While both nations share a common culture, language, and history, their relationship is often marked by a one-sided nature. The term 'special' is frequently used during times of military conflict, where the UK is seen as a crucial ally, helping the US in various military interventions. However, this support is often one-way and does not extend to other areas, such as trade.

The One-Way Dynamic of the Relationship

Regarding trade, the 'special relationship' is often seen as a one-way street, with the US benefiting largely from this arrangement. UK traders and industries often face unfair terms, which do not provide mutual benefits. It is noteworthy that during wartime, the 'special relationship' is highlighted, but it tends to diminish in other contexts.

The Concept of National Interests

Both the US and UK have always prioritized their national interests, often at the expense of the other. The US, being a more powerful nation, has consistently succeeded in shaping agreements and policies that favor its national interest over that of the UK. This is evident in various aspects of the relationship, from trade to defense coordination.

Challenging British Exceptionalism

The 'special relationship' is often used to justify British exceptionalism, suggesting that the UK is somehow more significant or influential than other European nations. However, this is a misconception. The UK has always been treated as an ordinary European nation, albeit one with a long-standing alliance with the US.

The Role of US Politicians in Elevating the 'Special Relationship'

US politicians often use the 'special relationship' to dress up their national interests as a broader international coalition. This is a strategic move that helps in justify policies and interventions that are in the US's interest, rather than purely adopted after careful consideration of international cooperation.

Conclusion: A Critical Perspective

The 'special relationship' between the US and UK is more of a convenient myth than a genuine special alliance. While both nations share a rich history, language, and cultural ties, their relationship is often marked by a one-sided dynamic, with the US benefiting much more than the UK. The term 'special' is primarily used during times of conflict and is largely an excuse for the US to justify its actions in the name of alliance and shared interests.