The US Military's Perspective on Biden: A Balanced View

With Joe Biden's presidency now well underway, it's worth examining how the US military views him. Given the significant shift from the previous administration, it's natural to ask whether the military still sees Biden as the better president in terms of US military concerns.

Transition from the Trump Presidency

During the Trump presidency, the US military saw constant criticism and lambasting from a vocal segment of the population. Many were dubious about the direction the military was taking under Donald Trump's leadership. However, as a military veteran and West Point graduate with extensive experience in active service, I can attest that the military is generally a discipline and professional institution where personal political beliefs and preferences take a backseat to mission and duty.

Shifting Loyalties in the Military

When it comes to leadership at the highest levels, many in the military might have differing opinions. Some may consider Biden not worthy of the country's leadership due to their service under presidents like Nixon and Reagan. However, understanding the military ethos, these individuals will still do their utmost to support and serve the commander-in-chief, regardless of their personal opinions. The sense of duty and professionalism is paramount.

There are people in all five branches of the military who:

Support President Biden Disapprove of President Biden Are neutral and indifferent

Regardless of personal opinions, the military functions on a principle that dictates 'just doing' the job to the best of one's ability. This is not just the philosophy of the military but also its tangible reality in action.

The Role of the Commander in Chief

The Commander in Chief is the highest-ranking officer in the military. Joe Biden, as the President of the United States, also holds this title. This dual role means that even if military personnel personally dislike the President, their professional obligation is to support and follow his commands. This is a principle deeply ingrained in the military's culture and one that extends beyond individual opinions.

Military's Professionalism and Political Neutrality

Speaking politically or criticizing the President is generally considered inappropriate behavior in military circles. However, this doesn't mean that military personnel are devoid of personal opinions. Some may openly express their disapproval through more subtle means, such as not engaging in political conversations or staying silent during disagreements. Nevertheless, the focus remains on maintaining discipline and professionalism.

Recent trends indicate that the military's relationship with Biden is more neutral than harshly critical or supportive. Much like how they responded to previous administrations, the current environment seems to reflect a more normal cycle where military personnel are busy with their duties and are less inclined to engage in political discussions.

Take, for example, the Obama administration, where public opinions within the military were largely muted. The same pattern is visible with President Biden. Neither positive nor negative comments are heard often, aligning with the military's approach to maintaining a professional and non-political stance.

It is also noteworthy that during the George W. Bush presidency, the military's stance was largely supportive, especially during the period of active combat operations. The respect and support for the President during such critical times highlight the deep bond between the military and its leaders, regardless of the incumbent's political alignment.

Conclusion

While the US military has seen significant changes under President Biden, the ethos and principles remain unchanged. For military personnel, the key remains doing their job to the best of their abilities, regardless of the political leanings of the President.

So, while some may voice their opinions openly, others will remain silent but supportive. The military's focus on discipline, professionalism, and mission-driven service ensures that the country's armed forces continue to operate effectively, even as political dynamics shift.