WorkWorld

Location:HOME > Workplace > content

Workplace

Understanding SSC CGL Tier 2 2018 Normalization Impact on Marks

March 03, 2025Workplace4230
Understanding SSC CGL Tier 2 2018 Normalization Impact on Marks The SS

Understanding SSC CGL Tier 2 2018 Normalization Impact on Marks

The SSC CGL Tier 2 examination of 2018 employed a normalization process to adjust the scores of candidates from different shifts. This adjustment aimed to ensure fairness, as candidates from varying shifts faced similar but varying levels of difficulty. Here, we delve into the specifics of how normalization worked in this exam and the marks increased or decreased.

Normalization Process Overview

Normalization was a crucial step in the SSC CGL Tier 2 2018 examination, particularly for candidates appearing in different shifts. This process adjusted the raw scores to mitigate differences in difficulty levels between shifts and ensure a fair comparison. Below, we analyze the impact it had on candidate scores, highlighting the variation in marks increased or decreased.

Overall Marks Increase Following Normalization

While the exact number of marks increased can vary for each candidate, empirical estimates report that on average, candidates saw an increase of around 10-15 marks after normalization. However, individual scores varied based on the candidate's raw score and the overall performance of other candidates in their session.

Normalization Insights for SSC CGL Tier 2 2018

The period of the 2018 CGL Mains examination spanned three days: 11-13 September 2019. The difficulty levels varied across the three days, influencing the degree of normalization:

t11th September: The normalization resulted in an increase of 1-2 marks in most cases, with occasional decreases. The maximum increase of 5-10 marks was observed for a small number of candidates. t12th September: The scores either remained the same or showed a modest increase of up to 3 marks. This was also my exam day. t13th September: This day saw a significant increase, with normalization granting up to 15-20 additional marks.

A brief look at the degree of normalization for specific subjects confirms these points. In arithmetic, approximately 12 marks were increased, and around 15 marks in English. Let us explore the detailed raw and normalized scores from various shifts.

Normalized Scores for Different Shifts

The results from different shifts are instructive in understanding how the normalization process affected individual candidates. Here are some key insights:

11th September Shift

tQuantitative Aptitude: The raw score had a slight decrease of up to 2.04 marks. The normalized score was adjusted accordingly. tEnglish: The normalized score showed a slight increase, with the range being from 3.10 to 4.35 marks.

12th September Shift

tQuantitative Aptitude: The normalized score was nearly the same as the raw score, indicating minimal adjustment. tEnglish: Again, the normalized score was close to the raw score, showing a mild increase.

13th September Shift

tQuantitative Aptitude: A dramatic shift, with a net increase of up to 17.43 marks after normalization. tEnglish: The English section also saw a significant increase, with the normalized score showing a gain of up to 8.36 marks.

Preparing for the SSC CGL Tier 2

Scoring normalization illustrates the importance of a strategic approach to preparation. For candidates appearing in different shifts, understanding the normalization process and the potential impact on their final scores can be crucial. Here are some tips:

tStay alert to changes in the exam pattern and difficulty levels. tPractice consistently, especially in weak areas identified during preliminary stages. tSpare time to review and refine answers in the run-up to the exam.

Conclusion

The normalization process in the SSC CGL Tier 2 2018 was a critical aspect in ensuring fairness across different shifts. While the degree of increase varied, the general trend was an improvement in scores, with significant differences observed in certain sections and shifts. Understanding this process can provide valuable insights for candidates preparing for future examinations.