Why Irresponsible Individuals and Law Enforcement Officers Use Unjustified Excuses

It is often seen that individuals, especially those in positions of authority like some members of law enforcement, use a series of flimsy excuses to justify their actions or inactions. This phenomenon is not limited to a single individual or group but rather spans across various contexts and social dynamics. One such instance highlights the ridiculous nature of these excuses when applied to the scenario of the US Capitol Insurrection, where some Oath Keepers have pleaded guilty, while others refuse to acknowledge their responsibility.

The Role of Excuses in Justifying Actions

Excuses can be defined as attempts to explain or make an action seem less harmful or responsible. However, in many instances, these excuses are nothing more than a cover-up for personal failings or unethical behavior. For example, consider the analogy of a person who robs a store. Just because the store does not have a burglar alarm does not make the person who committed the theft any less guilty. Similarly, the murder of a person cannot be excused simply because the victim was not wearing body armour.

The title "Why do the Oath Keepers do not say that" refers to the discomfort or refusal of some members of Oath Keepers to acknowledge their part in the US Capitol Insurrection. It is important to recognize that terms such as "insurrection" can be misleading. In the United States, it is often referred to as a protest or a demonstration. It is crucial to avoid the politicization of a term that can lead to division and misunderstanding.

The Use of Excuses by Law Enforcement Officers

Many of the Oath Keepers who are currently under scrutiny or former law enforcement officers tend to avoid responsibility by using excuses. They argue that if the Capitol Police were not fully prepared, then the lawbreakers should not be held accountable. This line of reasoning is flawed and dangerous. The same logic would imply that if a burglar is not caught because the door was not locked, the burglar is not guilty. This line of thinking is absurd and can lead to lawlessness.

It is important to distinguish between lack of preparation and lack of responsibility. The responsibility of an individual does not diminish simply because the circumstances were not ideal. A egregious act remains an egregious act, regardless of the barriers or weaknesses present at the time.

Calling Out Irresponsible Excuses

Moreover, it is essential to recognize that making excuses for actions that go against the law or ethical standards will not be well-received by the public or in a court of law. Those who engage in irresponsible behavior and attempt to lay blame on others for their own shortcomings will not be excused.

For example, if a police officer engages in misconduct, the excuse that they were not fully prepared does not absolve them of their actions. The same applies to Oath Keepers or anyone else who commits acts that go against the law. The excuse that someone was not prepared does not justify their actions.

It is time to move beyond these excuses and take responsibility for our actions. Whether it is law enforcement officers or individuals who engage in misconduct, acknowledging and taking responsibility for our actions is crucial for building a just and fair society.

As responsible individuals and law enforcement professionals, it is essential to learn from these experiences and strive to improve. This includes not only personal growth but also systemic reforms to ensure that all individuals are held accountable for their actions.

The responsible and ethical way to approach these situations is by acknowledging the gravity of one's actions and taking appropriate steps to address the issues.