Using Controversial Figures in Fiction: A Guide for Writers

Writing fiction often means incorporating real-life individuals or entities with objectionable viewpoints, such as a racist or sexist police officer. This article explores how to handle such references without endorsing controversial figures or ideas. We'll examine why such characters can be valuable in fiction and provide practical advice on their portrayal.

The Challenge of Controversial References

When writing fiction, you may come across the need to include references to real-life individuals or entities who hold objectionable viewpoints. It's important to recognize that the term objectionable is a subjective word. What one person views as objectionable, another might not. In such cases, considering the term controversial may be more appropriate. Writers often use controversial figures to illustrate a character's beliefs or mindset without necessarily endorsing those views.

The Role of the Author

Your job as a writer is to create art and communicate your message through your storytelling. You may need to refer to a controversial person or idea to convey a particular idea, feeling, or image. You might include a passing reference to a mindset, or you might delve into a detailed portrayal. However, the way you present these figures significantly impacts how readers interpret your work. Some readers may react negatively, while others may not see it as an endorsement of the figure's views.

Examples and Best Practices

1. Peter James' Approach: Consider the example of Peter James in the Roy Grace series. He uses a controversial, prejudiced cop as a character. The lead detective tolerates him despite his objectionable views, recognizing his skills as a copper. This nuanced portrayal mirrors real-life situations more accurately and highlights the complexities of human nature.

2. Importance of Context: The context in which you present a controversial figure influences how readers perceive your work. For instance, Donald Trump's character in the satirical novel Squeeze Me is treated critically, making it clear where the author stands on the issue. While a few might misinterpret this as an endorsement, most readers would recognize the author's message.

3. Characterization and Messaging: Using a real-life figure to illustrate a character's beliefs can be an effective shortcut. For example, a character who states they believe Donald Trump is still President conveys a lot about their worldview in a few words. Similarly, a character who campaigned for Bernie Sanders or Eugene McCarthy quickly gives readers insight into their political views.

Risks and Considerations

While including controversial figures can be valuable, it also comes with potential risks. In today's polarized environment, such characters can be easily misinterpreted as endorsements. It's crucial to manage the portrayal carefully, maintaining a clear stance on the character's views. Even when dealing with potentially controversial material, it's important to respect the reader by not assuming clear cut opinions on your characters. This requires a nuanced approach to deliver your message effectively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, incorporating controversial figures in fiction does carry risks, but it also offers a powerful tool for character development and message delivery. By understanding the context and nature of the portrayal, you can navigate these challenges effectively and create rich, multifaceted stories that resonate with your audience. Remember, the goal is to use your characters, including controversial ones, to enhance your storytelling, not to endorse their views.