Why Arent We Providing Homes to the Homeless When We Have Plenty of Empty Properties?

Introduction

The question of why the United States isn't providing homes to homeless individuals when there are more empty properties than homeless people is a complex and multi-faceted issue. This article will explore the underlying reasons and implications of this situation, drawing on personal anecdotes and broader economic and social contexts.

Personal Anecdotes

Imagine this: You own a house, and you move somewhere else, leaving the old one empty. You're in the process of preparing to sell it, but it becomes a haven for the homeless, who break in and use your possessions, leaving a mess behind. This is not a rare occurrence, as many property owners can attest. Consider these scenarios:

Leaving a key at the house during a vacation, only to find that someone else already had the audacity to break in. A man occupying your garage overnight, storing your belongings while you are away. Clothes in the dryer being used, and windows being broken to gain access to the property.

Do these experiences sound similar to what you've faced? If you had the option to just ignore the problem and walk away, would you consider giving that house, worth $450,000, to homeless individuals?

Supplies and Services

The responsibility of providing warmth, lights, sewage, garbage disposal, and other essential services isn't something that can be shouldered lightly. Ensuring a safe and livable environment for individuals who have been homeless requires a significant investment. Should the law demand that you maintain the lawn or deal with such other responsibilities?

Current Economic System

One of the fundamental issues lies in the current economic system, where homes are primarily built to generate profit rather than to provide shelter for individuals in need. This profit-driven approach often neglects the essential need for affordable housing. As a result, homes are left empty when residents move, and these properties sit vacant while many individuals are homeless.

Deserted Cities and Ghost Towns

Consider cities that used to be booming and now stand almost deserted. Detroit, for example, was once a thriving hub, but the 1967 riots exacerbated existing racial tensions and deepened social divides. Concurrently, the decline of the automobile industry left the city without a solid economic base, which was further destabilized by the drug trade.

Similarly, other towns now face high rents, or properties that are foreclosed by banks, making them unavailable for affordable housing. Vacant properties are often seen as blights on the landscape, a reminder of urban decay and neoliberal policies that favor profit over people.

Should Vacant Homes Be Given to Homeless Individuals?

The logical question then arises: should we provide homeless individuals with these vacant homes? If you say no, you need to provide an answer to your own question. The challenge is not just about the physical space but about the services and maintenance required to turn a property into a viable living environment.

Safety and Security

Many vacant properties are not safe for habitation. Abandoned buildings often have structural issues, lack proper plumbing and electrical systems, and may be infested with pests or have other hazards that make them unsuitable for use.

Moreover, providing security to these properties when they are not occupied is a challenge. How can we ensure that these homes are kept safe and free from the same issues that plague vacant properties?

Conclusion

The issue of providing homes to the homeless is multifaceted and involves economic, social, and political aspects. While solving this problem requires a comprehensive approach, the current economic system and policies are a significant barrier. Addressing these underlying issues is crucial in providing equitable and sustainable solutions for the homeless.