Why Collective Bargaining Should Not Be Tolerated: The Case of Longshoremen and Extortion

David makes a valid point about automation. In the modern era, every developed nation has advanced significantly in logistics handling. Longshoring, an outdated profession, requires a fundamental transformation through automation. Advanced technologies and artificial intelligence are becoming integral to industries, and jobs will continue to evolve. The time has come for us to embrace these changes rather than resist them.

Automation and Job Obsolescence

Longshoring and many similar jobs will be rendered obsolete due to automation. This is a reality that must be acknowledged and adapted to. Companies will naturally seek ways to maintain control and efficiency, often leading to the integration of automation, as witnessed in the fast-food industry after minimum wage increases.

The Union's Demands and Their Impact

It’s crucial to examine the rhetoric and demands of unions, particularly the Longshoremen. The union is seeking substantial wage hikes and protection from automation, which is a misguided request. The union is demanding a 77% raise over six years, translating to a 5% increase per year of the contract. This means the top-scale hourly rate could reach $69 by 2030, or over $140,000 per year.

That aside, these workers are already in a position of high remuneration and benefits. Considering that essential goods and materials are transported via ships and that overseas production keeps the economy flowing, any additional costs from these demands will be passed on to consumers. Yet, it is important to note that the union leaders themselves live in mansions worth over $700,000, highlighting a significant disconnect with the working class they purport to represent.

The Reality of Longshoreman Work

Being a longshoreman is undoubtedly dangerous work. The hazardous conditions that these workers face year-round warrant some form of premium pay. However, the demands for such a significant salary and benefits package are unrealistic and counterproductive to the industry's progress. Instead of working towards sustainable and efficient methods of freight handling, the union's demands are essentially financial extortion.

Conclusion

The situation with the Longshoremen exposes a fundamental issue with collective bargaining. In the age of automation and technological advancement, unions must be reevaluated for their effectiveness and fairness. Simply demanding drastic wage increases and protection from technological change is not sustainable. It is time for both unions and employers to work together to find a middle ground that ensures efficient and safe work environments while respecting market realities.