Why Mukesh Ambani and His Family Have Been Given Z Security Cover

Mukesh Ambani, the richest man in Asia, has been under Z security cover for a considerable time now. This cover extends beyond typical security measures, involving extensive protection and surveillance. The controversy around this security cover has been ongoing, prompting claims and counterclaims about its necessity and cost.

Origins of the Z Security Cover

The story of Z security for the Ambanis began as early as 2013. Since then, the cover has been continuously extended. According to multiple reports, the family pays a significant amount for this security—they pay INR 15 lakh (approximately USD 20,000) for the Z security cover, thus ensuring that the expenses do not fall on the public treasury.

Separation of Personal Security Costs and Public Funding

A key point of contention is the lack of public funding for the Ambanis' security. It is often argued that such high-profile individuals should not be enabled to shoulder the cost of their personal security on the back of common taxpayer money. By funding this security themselves, the Ambanis are adhering to a clear principle of personal responsibility.

Risks and Threats

With his immense wealth and influence, Mukesh Ambani is a high-profile target for both business rivalries and potential terrorist threats. As a result, his family is under constant threat of kidnapping or even assassination by extremist groups. Such an attack could have serious repercussions, including a significant crash in the share market, leading to economic instability.

Highest Risk Target

As one of the most prominent business leaders in the region, Ambani stands out as one of the largest targets for criminal or terrorist activities. Security experts argue that giving comprehensive Z security cover is a prudent measure to protect him and his family. This ensures that any threat to their safety is swiftly addressed, thereby safeguarding the broader economic and social fabric.

Supreme Court Rejection of PILs Against Z Security

In a recent legal development, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Himanshu Agarwal to withdraw Z security cover from Mukesh Ambani and his family. The court, led by Justice Ashok Bhushan, upheld that it is the responsibility of the state to assess and review the threat perception of individuals and make decisions on providing such security.

Justification by the Supreme Court

During the hearing, the Supreme Court affirmed that it is for the state to determine the threat perception of individuals and provide security cover accordingly. The court did not deem the PIL a valid reason to withdraw the security cover, emphasizing the necessity of such measures in the interest of public safety and economic stability.

Conclusion

The Z security cover for Mukesh Ambani and his family is a complex issue influenced by various factors, including personal risk management and national security. While there are valid concerns about the allocation of public funds, the reality is that high-profile individuals often need to secure their own safety. The Supreme Court's decision underscores the balance between individual responsibility and state security measures.