Why Racism Towards Whites is Tolerated and Perfected Through Antiwhitism

At No White Guilt, we challenge the dominance of antiwhitism in contemporary social morality. Antiwhitism has come to be seen as morally righteous, yet this does not reflect the true nature of every white individual. The concept of antiwhitism is pivotal in the Go Free method, a lexicon and strategy developed by Jason Kohne to empower No White Guilt members and redefine their narrative.

The term antiwhitism was inspired by how Jews adopted the word antisemitism, demonstrating the effectiveness of reclaiming narrative control. Our community has successfully applied these principles, even garnering support from high-profile figures like President Donald Trump! For more insights, please visit our Quora space.

Understanding Antiwhitism

Antiwhitism is not just a tacit concept; it is a social morality of the day. According to Kohne, it is considered moral to persecute and victimize white individuals. This has created a narrative where white people find themselves in a persistent victimhood, while the perpetrators remain unchallenged.

In the face of such a narrative, it is crucial to frame a new morality where the White race is not seen as the antagonist but as the protagonist. This is our mission. By understanding our own values and aligning them with those of the broader community, we can work towards white wellbeing and the recapture of our collective destiny.

The Roots of Antiwhitism

Not all white people are beyond redemption; however, far from the majority, there have been and continue to be those who hold deeply prejudiced views. We often hear rhetoric from some white individuals that their existence is offensive and undesirable, leading to outright hostility, even to the point of advocacy for the deaths of millions of people.

Taking the example of Colin Riegels, who famously downplayed the atrocities committed during the Iraq War by comparing it to leaving milk unattended, or Richard Lock who echoed the White Man's Burden, we observe a clear polarization in values that define antiwhitism. These individuals openly espouse views that are harmful to non-whites and are thus categorized as evil within the No White Guilt narrative.

It is not just the vocal few. Even amongst the broader population, there are tendencies that align with antiwhitism. These inclinations are evident in the support for devastating actions, such as the atrocities committed in Gaza, the ongoing support for organizations like ISIS and Al-Qaeda, and subtle displays of racism within the media. These manifestations are not limited to a small segment of the population, as evidenced by the Go Free method and the shift in societal norms.

Consequences of Antiwhitism

The toxicity of these beliefs does not stop at rhetoric. When white individuals commit harmful actions, there is often an expectation that they should—and indeed must—repair the damage. However, this requirement is sometimes met with resistance from many white nationalists, who claim no responsibility for the wide-reaching consequences of their actions.

A relevant case in point is the refugee crisis, where white governments bear the brunt of their own actions. While some individuals may oppose these actions, the majority either supported them or turned a blind eye. Voter turnout and public opinion polls illustrate that the majority of white populations are supportive of such actions, even when presented with the negative outcomes.

In conclusion, the tolerance and perpetuation of racism towards whites are deeply rooted in the broader social and political landscape. By continuing to challenge and expose these inherent biases, we can work towards a more equitable and just society for all.