Why Students of Political Science Should Not Seek Objectivity and Neutrality

Conventional wisdom might dictate that students of political science should strive for objectivity and neutrality in their studies. However, as I will argue, this is not necessary and may even hinder their understanding of the subject matter.

Objectivity and Neutrality Are Impossible to Co-Exist

One critical misconception is the simultaneous pursuit of objectivity and neutrality. Objectivity entails the relentless pursuit of truth, even if it leads one to uncomfortable conclusions. By definition, it sometimes necessitates acknowledging and stating one's position, as dictated by the facts and evidence. On the other hand, neutrality typically implies avoiding any form of bias, whether conscious or unconscious. These two concepts are inherently contradictory.

Bias is Inherent in Human Nature

Another fundamental argument against seeking political neutrality is that bias is an integral part of human nature. It is almost impossible to completely suppress one's biases. While one can be transparent about their biases and blindspots, this does not equate to their absence. Understanding and acknowledging one's own biases is essential, but perfect neutrality is unattainable.

Political Science's Nature and Soft Conclusions

Additionally, political science is less objective than fields like biology or physics. This means its conclusions are often more interpretative and less quantifiable. Conceptual interpretations are inherent to political science, making it unrealistic to demand strict objectivity.

The Dangers of Authoritarianism and Subjectivity

Authoritarian regimes often rely on subjectivity as a means to control and manipulate the populace. In contrast, democratic systems thrive on the representation of diverse opinions and unbiased information. Personal biases can easily overpower collective rationality, leading to authoritarian outcomes.

For example, Louis XIV’s famous statement, “I am the state!” exemplifies authoritarianism, whereas “We the People” encapsulates the democratic sentiment. Authoritarianism thrives on subjectivity, while democracy values objectivity and rational discourse.

Political Careers Require Loyal Stances

For students who aspire to a political career, neutrality is often counterproductive. Upon graduation, they should align with and advocate for a particular political ideology. Building networks and establishing connections early on can aid their advancement in the political sphere. Political neutrality, especially in the early stages, could severely limit their opportunities and hinder their progress.

However, it is crucial to accurately understand the subject matter. Staying neutral and objective in researching the factual basis of political claims ensures a more comprehensive and accurate understanding. Students must scrutinize the entire narrative behind each political stance, not just the version presented by politicians.

Conclusion

While the pursuit of objectivity and neutrality in political science is noble, it is often unattainable and potentially detrimental. Students should embrace their biases but strive for balance and transparency. For those interested in careers in politics, picking a stance and building relevant networks will provide better chances for success. Ultimately, the key is to understand the essence of the subject matter, not to blindly adhere to abstract notions of neutrality.