Reservation in the UPSC CSE: Ria Dabi and Legacy of Preferential Policies

The recent spotlight on Ria Dabi's utilization of reservations in the UPSC CSE 2020, much like her sister Tina Dabi in 2015, brings to light an ongoing debate surrounding the Indian reservation system. This article delves into the complexities and controversies surrounding preferential policies in government recruitment, particularly in the context of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) Civil Services Examination (CSE).

Reservation and Its Impact on Indian Governance

Reservation, a constitutional provision, aims to provide equal opportunities to historically marginalized communities in various spheres of Indian governance, including government jobs and educational institutions. It is a mechanism intended to correct the wrongs of the past and ensure a fair representation of all social groups. However, the current system often raises questions about its effectiveness and fairness.

Controversies Surrounding Reservation in the UPSC CSE

Ria Dabi's case highlights the broader issue of preferential policies. Similar to her sister Tina Dabi and her father, she availed of the reservation benefit. Critics argue that this system has become a means for favoritism and privilege rather than what it was intended to be—a tool for uplifting marginalized sections of society. The question of whether reservation is being utilized effectively for its intended beneficiaries is increasingly being debated.

Financial Parameters vs. Educational Background

One of the key debates revolves around the adoption of financial parameters for reservation instead of relying solely on educational background and historical injustices. Proponents argue that financement should be a key factor, as historical injustices may not necessarily reflect the current financial status of individuals. Detractors maintain that this approach might inadvertently exclude individuals who, although financially stable, might have a strong case for reservation based on justice for the past.

Injustice to Merit-Based Candidates

There is a growing concern that reservation policies are not reaching the deserving candidates who are genuinely marginalized. In many cases, financially sound individuals with no genuine need for reservation are benefiting from these policies. For example, a case from 2019 where the author narrowly missed the interview call by 35 marks, despite belonging to the general category and having limited financial means, stood out. This individual argued that they deserved reservation more than those who were receiving preferential treatment unfairly.

The Urgency of Reformation

The author concludes by emphasizing the urgent need for reform in the reservation system. With the potential of these policies becoming a mere favoritism rather than a tool for genuine upliftment, it is crucial to act now before the situation gets worse. The justice for the past must not lead to injustices in the present and future.

Good luck and JAI HIND.

Conclusion

As we move forward, it is essential to reassess and reevaluate the reservation system to ensure that it truly serves its intended purpose. The challenge lies in finding a balance that upholds the principles of equality and justice while addressing the specific needs of marginalized communities.