Why Are Postal Workers Called ‘Mailmen’?

Postal workers, also known as mail carriers or letter carriers, play a crucial role in the delivery of mail and packages. However, their title has faced criticism, particularly regarding the use of the term 'mailman.' This article delves into the origins, evolution, and controversies surrounding this nomenclature.

The Historical Context of 'Mailman'

Back in the day, the term 'mailman' was widely used to describe the individuals responsible for delivering mail. This terminology was rooted in the fact that historically, mail delivery was predominantly the job of men. The job of delivering mail was seen as a physically demanding task, and society at the time viewed such roles through the lens of the gender norms prevalent during that time.

Modern Terminology: Letter Carrier and Mail Person

Over the years, there have been efforts to modernize the terminology used to describe these workers. In recent decades, terms like 'letter carrier' and 'mail person' have gained traction. The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) officially refers to its delivery personnel as 'Letter Carrier' or 'Rural Carrier,' making a clear distinction from 'Mail Person,' as the latter is not exclusive to postal workers alone.

The Controversy and Its Resolutions

Despite the introduction of modern terms, some individuals and communities continue to use the term 'mailman.' This has sparked debates, particularly in terms of gender sensitivity. Critics argue that using 'mailman' is outdated and potentially discriminatory, as it suggests that the job is only suitable for men. They advocate for more inclusive terms like 'mail carrier' or 'mail person.'

Why 'Mankind' and 'Mailman' Matter

The use of 'mankind' to refer to all human beings is another example of gendered language. Similarly, 'mailman' can be problematic for the same reason. The term 'mankind' excludes women from the human race, while 'mailman' implies that mail delivery is not a role for women.

The Need for Inclusivity

Advocates for inclusivity suggest alternative terms such as 'female mailmen,' 'female carriers,' or 'mail lady' to explicitly recognize the gender diversity among postal workers. These terms help address the issue of gender exclusion and promote a more inclusive language.

For example, using 'female carriers' alongside 'male carriers' acknowledges both genders equally.

Conclusion

The evolution of terminology in reference to postal workers reflects broader societal changes in language and inclusivity. While 'mailman' has historical roots, the need for modern, inclusive language is essential. Terms like 'mail carrier' and 'letter carrier' not only avoid gender bias but also better reflect the diverse workforce in the postal industry.